Sunday, August 26, 2007

WHEN 99 IS BIGGER THAN A 100

Every time Sachin Tendulkar steps on to the field nowadays with a bat in his hand, there is bound to be a debate. There are supporters who feel that Sachin can still play the kind of cricket that made him great in the first place. There are detractors who argue that Sachin should step down.

In the second one dayer at Bristol, India needed to put a good total on the board after Rahul Dravid won the toss and elected to bat. That decision presupposed a good knock from Sachin at the top of the order.

For a while, Sachin missed a number of balls but as the innings progressed, there were some of the trademark drives. He played well enough to get a 100 but was dismissed for 99. That sparked off a debate.

It is pointed out that Sachin lost his ability to score a 100. Some expressed their anguish over the fact that Sachin missed the opportunity to add to his tally of international tons. Evidence is gleaned from the near misses on this tour so far. Does a 100 from Sachin matter so much for the fan? Sachin himself would be the first to say that the team win was more satisfactory than another 100.

Even Donald Bradman could not score the four runs that would have taken his average to a perfect 100. That is the mystique of cricket.

For the numerically obsessed fan, it is worth a lot to keep in mind that statistics or more correctly put, the average is a bikini that covers less than what it reveals.

Labels: ,

1 Comments:

Blogger Tubbyy said...

Sachin cannot be said to have lost the ability to score a 100. 4 times he came close to score a 100, 3 times he fell to a shocker of a decision.

Blame it on umpires. And his 99 in Bristol, 93 in Ireland and 91 in Tent Bridge were bloody good enough to win the games for India.

And then critics say he doesnt win India matches.

Cheers

Tubby(tubbyszooter.blogspot.com)

9:44 AM

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home